The first thing that I notice is
that the narrator, Elizabeth, recognizes her mother’s despair from a young age.
While she doesn’t fully understand the depth of it, because her mother doesn’t
speak much of past things, she understands that her mother is affected by the loss
in her life. On page 4, the narrator talks about the twenty-third Psalms (“The
Lord is my Shepard, I shall not want…”), and the affect it has on her mother.
Instead of the scripture being a comfort to her, the words are a reflection of
sorrow to her mother. She associates the words with death because they’re repeatedly
spoken at funeral services. While Elizabeth (child’s view) views the
manuscripts as “beautiful,” they are a reminder of tragedy in her mother’s
eyes. As a result, the narrator wants to protect her mother because she senses “something
fragile” in her (9). The narrator can also see the disintegration
of her parent’s marriage, 1968. She acknowledges the fact that it may have already
been falling apart before, but this is when she begins to notice (12).
I also see two
or three separate perspectives of the child’s eye. Two from the children who have
grown up in nuclear homes, at some point, have different viewpoints from that of
the children who live in foster care. (This is something that is repeated in time).
In Hayward, Elizabeth’s mother’s childhood was somewhat magical. Although Aunt Dorothy
later reveals her father’s infidelities to Elizabeth, her mother adores their
father. She has good memories in a home where there are “treasures in the attic…”
and she and her sister can jump “from the barn roof with umbrellas, hoping for
flight (12).” Although the children may have had opposing viewpoints of their
father, at least one (or maybe both girls, we don’t get much of Dorothy’s childhood
perspective), was able to dream and
the other able to distinguish. (Distinguish referring back to the counselor
remarks about the “Care kids” being unable to express their emotions. Happy,
angry, sad, etc.) At The Shelter Care (84-85), the children are described as “lost”
and “thrown away” as a result of their circumstances (molestation, physical and
mental abuse, etc.), which cases their mistrust of adults. “It’s a matter of survival.
It’s dangerous to get attached, to open up, to confide. Everyone must first be
measured. Everyone is found lacking.” The children who have been cast away can
only see as far as their hurt, because that’s
all they know.
In contrast, the narrator gives us
a rundown of names that connect husband to wife on both sides of her children’s
family. (Her mother and father, her grandparents, Aunt Dorothy and her husband,
Dora and her husband, Grace and Rodrigo (Fernando’s grandparents), Norma and
her husband Poncho, etc.) While there may have been some issues within the
family, the narrator provides a history of relationships, many of which
standing the test of time. These are positive examples that, for instance, the “Care
kids” don’t have. “He is the only one they trust,” is how the narrator
describes the children in relation to her 2year old son Michael. The images
they see looking up from the ironing board have all been distorted, because
adult = hurt and mistrust to them. This is why Michael is favored because they
view him beneath the ironing board where it’s safe.
Finally,
dreams, illusions, and foretelling of the future occurs below the ironing board.
Dora sees her Aunt’s death as a child before it occurs, and her mother slaps
her for it (22). Fernando sees his wife in a dream before he ever meets Elizabeth.
“It was in a vision,” he says (47). Fernando’s tata Rodrigo knows from childhood, he will marry Grace. He is
twelve at the time and Grace is just a baby. “Daughter of a schoolteacher…he
would marry her (69).”
Britney Hill (Brit)
You decoded the matrix. You illustrate quite well how she pulls the perspectives together. The distortion your talk about seems to pervade the text--as if it's fragments of a dream. really well done
ReplyDeletee
Brit,
ReplyDeleteGreat work here. The thing that stands out most to me about what you have written here is when you discus that the narrator can see the splintering of her parents relationship. "She acknowledges the fact that it may have already been falling apart before, but this is when she begins to notice (12)." This part stuck out to me then and it sticks out to me now as a perfect example of the narrator coming out from the ironing board and up the ladder as Elamaz says. Way to point that out.
Best,
CF
"In contrast, the narrator gives us a rundown of names that connect husband to wife on both sides of her children’s family." Just wanted to applaud this observation. I was thinking through this earlier today but this here captures so much. I definitely am looking forward to hearing your insights tomorrow.
ReplyDelete