Sunday, February 7, 2016

Believe It or Not


From the first sentence in The Glass Castle and throughout the book, one unbelievable event to next continues to unfold.  It’s as if that familiar kid that everyone knew in elementary school is back from summer vacation telling one fantastic tale after another.  You never knew rather to believe the stories of adventure and wonderment or shrug them off as just another fairytale in the life of a third grader with a hyper active imagination.  However, there is something endearing and honest about Jeannette Walls’ memoir that convinces the reader to believe every word, every occurrence, no matter how unbelievable they appear to be.

              It could be argued that the events in The Glass Castle are believable because the book is a memoir. Memoirs have to be true, right?  Perhaps the book is believable because the narrator is also a character in the book, but, as a fiction writer I must admit that it crossed my mind that maybe the creative portion of creative non-fiction occupied more space than the non-fiction portion.  Seeing one’s mother “rooting through a dumpster” and instead of leaving the comforts of your taxi to help, you instruct the driver to “turn around and take me home to Park Avenue” reads more like a rags to riches box office hit than a memoir. Regardless, what makes the book endearing is the narrator’s guilt “I was embarrassed by them, too and ashamed of myself for wearing pearls and living on Park Avenue while my parents were busy keeping warm and finding something to eat.” This is where things get interesting.  If there is guilt, there is a relationship with meaning.   Once the reader makes this connection it becomes plausible that a three-year-old cooking hot dogs can set herself on fire and consequently needs recusing for the safety of a hospital to return home where she is unattended, “You don’t have to worry anymore, baby,” Dad said. “You’re safe now.

              Walls skillfully reveals the irrational decisions of Rose Mary by providing vivid examples of characters from a child's point of view. Rose Mary Walls for example turns every unfortunate turn of events into something wonderful.  When she pulled a piano from the front door through the back instead of into the house, she said, “Oopsie-daisy most pianist never get the chance to play in the great out-of-doors, and now the whole neighborhood can enjoy the music too.”  The fact that most people don’t drive pianos through the house or leave them in the back yard is never discussed. As a craft choice, not discussing it shows how irrational Rose Mary really is and further convinces the reader to believe unbelievable behavior.

 It’s not until her children are starving that change occurs, “It’s not my fault if you’re hungry!” she shouted. Don’t blame me. Do you think I like living like this? Do you?   The family rule had been broken, "We were supposed to pretend our life was one long and incredibly fun adventure." For the reader, things begin to come into focus, unbelievable events become normal. I believe.



6 comments:

  1. I'm glad I wasn't the only one who was suspicious of possible exaggeration on the memoirist's part (it made me feel like a wet blanket). I like when you said, "If there is guilt, there is a relationship with meaning." Conflicting feelings are 110% more realistic and believable than linear, baseline emotions (I.e. pure disgust, pure shame, pure anything unblemished by a conflicting emotion slicing through it). Guilt is probably the most conflicted feeling there is, don't you think? Satisfaction and shame and conviction and conscience all rolled up with memory and experience. Guilt clues you into something deep-rooted and complex, a story with multiple sides. Far more believable than the simple, shallow triumph of a "rags to riches box office hit", as you so aptly put it. Thanks, Stacy!

    ReplyDelete
  2. G. Schulte, yes guilt is the most conflicted feeling. It is the only one that seemed to be consistent in the book and therefore the one that made it believable for me. After all guilt is a logical emotional response to knowingly doing something you believe is not right or that hurts another but you do it anyway. Each character in the book suffered from guilt to some extent. Rex for choosing to buy alcohol rather than food for his family, Rose Mary for choosing motherly neglect rather than standing up to Rex, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The guilt bit is interesting in a story where survival was the goal. I wonder if the reader aligns with guilt more than hunger or disenfranchisement. A child's trust is unbelievable and sometimes our adult knowledge, doesn't allow us to see the vulnerabilities of that. This is getting interesting.
    e

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, I also believe that survivor syndrome (guilt) happens when a person perceives themselves to have done wrong by surviving a traumatic event when others did not. Whereas the protagonist survives a world where hunger and neglect are coded as "one long and incredibly fun adventure" Rex and Rose Mary did not. This requires further investigation...

    ReplyDelete
  5. LOL! So happy we had this discussion before hand. I completely agree. I felt the story was completely exaggerated as well, but maybe the narrator was writing 'her' truth. And the truth is, maybe through 'her' child's eye....all of these events were reality. That's how I tried to look at things and create credibility in the narrators voice. I had to look at things in that light because I would have read the entire book with a huge "lying" chip on my shoulder. I would have read it feeling cheated in a sense??? I don't know... The "author honor code" line is/was thinly walked here.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This! Nails my first impression. It's too much of a bootstraps American story (or a rags to riches box office hit, as you beautifully put it) beginning. If we can speak frankly, I immediately wonder how the hell she could live with herself. But one thing I will give her is that she was able to narrativize it quickly to explain what was happening. The scene becomes more memorable because it was such a slap in the face until the readers realize that maybe that would be the reaction you have to a mother like that. The hotdog cooking fires seem like nothing as the lives of her parents unravels. It is a very interesting tactic to have the reader start feeling empathy for the parents (like she did as a child) and then to move the reader towards being more critical.

    ReplyDelete